27th November 2025
The VORS collaboration brings together best-in-class UK SME expertise in Electronics & Software Product Design, Contract Electronics Manufacturing (CEM), and Full Box & System Build Production to deliver robust solutions for high-stakes markets, such as defence & security, medical, and life sciences.
Three Midlands manufacturing and design specialists are joining forces to make the most of a £bn opportunity in medical, life sciences, defence and security.
Outsourcing expert PP Control & Automation (PP C&A), electronics design and software developer ByteSnap Design and contract electronics manufacturer Kasdon has launched VORS (Versatile Outsourcing in Resilient Systems) to give the MoD, primes and major OEMs the opportunity to accelerate time-to-market, reduce risk and ensure sector compliance.
By delivering an integrated, end-to-end design/development, manufacturing and assembly service, the trio believe the collaboration can attract domestic and international orders where supply chain resilience is a priority.
VORS, which collectively employs more than 280 people and has annual revenues of £45m+, will streamline project management with a single, accountable partner across the entire product lifecycle, including prototyping, new product introduction (NPI) and full-scale production.
PP C&A’s Richard Spears, one of the driving forces in the initiative, commented: “The collaboration really started when the government announcements on defence spend, and investment surfaced.
“We were obviously keen to explore the opportunity and understand the requirements to gain market share and quickly recognised that this sector demands a specific capability set and product and system development that is highly regulated.
“Both Kasdon and ByteSnap have significant track-records in this field and complementary electronics and design expertise that would help us, as a manufacturing outsourcing partner, deliver the complete lifecycle for new clients.”
He went on to add: “The website has only just officially launched yet we’re already in talks with several companies that could be worth over £5m for the collective.”
Richard Spears, Marketing Manager, PP Control & Automation
Whilst Medical, life sciences and defence and security all operate in distinct sectors, they share remarkably similar behaviours and expectations when it comes to selecting and working with manufacturing partners.
The stringent demands, compliance requirements, and innovation pace of these regulated and high-stakes markets are requirements that VORS believes it can meet.
Significant investment in automation and quality accreditations (including ISO 13485) across the three businesses places the collaboration in a perfect position to deliver products that perform flawlessly in defence and safety-critical or life-dependent applications.
“Resilient systems is a fitting term to use for articulating the demands on products developed by OEMs in these markets,” added Steve Stockley, Managing Director of Kasdon.
“In all four sectors, systems are deployed in high-stakes, often harsh or unpredictable environments. They must withstand real-world stress. They demand long lifecycle performance, need robust supply chain security, and have high regulatory and safety expectations – this is VORS in a nutshell you could say.”
Steve Stockley, Managing Director, Kasdon
Dunstan Power, Director, ByteSnap Design
ByteSnap Design’s Dunstan Power, Director, concluded: “Several sector initiatives and directives are now focusing on closer working relationships with SMEs. For example, Ministry of Defence (MOD) has committed to enhancing engagements through its Defence Small and Medium-sized Enterprise Action Plan.
“This plan aims to simplify procurement processes, improve access to opportunities, and increase the MOD’s procurement spend with SMEs. The MedTech Funding Mandate (MTFM) is something similar for the medical sector and focuses on the uptake of selected innovative medical devices, diagnostics, and digital products by the NHS.
“VORS is perfect for both initiatives and close engagement will form part of our marketing action plan. I’m really pleased that three Midlands-based specialists have come together to harness these opportunities and, if successful, this will definitely create new employment in our region.”
For further information, please visit https://vors.org.uk/ or follow on LinkedIn.
Ian Knight, Chief Information Officer at PP Control & Automation (PP C&A) challenges the prevailing, often vague narrative around AI adoption and reframes the conversation around a more practical starting point: operational constraints.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept for manufacturers. It is already being explored across quotation, production planning, engineering, quality, supply chain and customer service functions. Yet, for many organisations, the gap between experimentation and meaningful operational impact remains difficult to close.
A leading aquaculture specialist – that is changing the way fish are vaccinated safely – has signed a major manufacturing deal.
On paper, defined discipline-specific suppliers can look organised. However, every additional supplier introduces another handoff, and every handoff creates another point where time, quality, communication and accountability can be lost.
Very rarely does growth not surface because an OEM lacks ambition. Shortcomings arise because operating models built to support such ambition don’t evolve quickly enough.
Recent weeks have brought two important industry moments into sharp focus, concluding that demand for AI and automation is rising, but investment, skills, and long-term thinking must follow.
For decades, one question has sat at the heart of operational strategy for machine builders and OEMs: make or buy? It’s a familiar debate and it isn’t the wrong question by any means, but perhaps it is an incomplete one.
In most machine building businesses, change is still treated as an exception. A late-stage drawing revision, component substitution, or wiring tweak discovered during build. Each one is handled, resolved, and signed off. And then everyone moves on. But what if that’s the wrong way to think about it? What if change isn’t the disruption to the system but the system itself?
