29th September 2021
A major disruptor in inventory management is targeting a £3m sales boost after it launched two new products.
Inventor-e, which employs 24 people at its Headquarters in Solihull, has tapped into the design and production capability of the Manufacturing Assembly Network (MAN) to be first to market with iVendScale and iBinScale.
The solutions provide a scale-based inventory management vending system and mobile automated replenishment to help boost productivity at factories across the world.
In order to meet rapid demand for its products, the company turned to MAN member company PP Control & Automation (PPC&A) to manage the design for manufacture and build, a decision that is already paying dividends with a secure supply chain in place to support thousands of units every year.
“Our high-tech applications offer connectivity and data solutions that provide remote inventory information services in real time and are already being used by a host of major global organisations, including Babcock, Boeing, Rexel and Wolseley,” explained Dean Henry, founder of Inventor-e.
“We recognised early on that our core strength lay in the design and constant evolution of products and solutions and that the manufacture and assembly of our systems should be outsourced to a partner that could grow with us as we expand.”
He continued: “This journey led to us appointing PPC&A to support the build of our first products in SmartStores Secure and iVendcab, which proved to us that this was the right approach and paved the way for our latest launches.
“We’ve just placed iVendScale into its first industrial location with Mitsubishi and the pipeline of orders suggest we’ll be hitting £5m next year, impossible without the right outsourcing solution in place.”
Fresh from the initial success, Cheslyn Hay-based PP Control & Automation was invited to take on full supply chain management for the iVendScale and iBinScale and, following a constant review of performance and capabilities, introduced fellow MAN members C-MAC SMT to satisfy all the Printed Circuit Board Assemblies requirements and Grove Design.
The latter, an experienced engineering design consultancy, was invited to support prototyping and explore ways where it could make the systems robust whilst keeping the costs competitive.
It reverse engineered the current products and this revealed several design improvements that could be made to improve both the speed of manufacture and the performance of the solutions.
Tony Hague, CEO of PP C&A, went on to add:
“Our role is to create the supply chain and the production line to ensure we can scale-up rapidly for Inventor-e’s existing solutions and its increasing range of new products.
“Our mechanical and assembly experience helped us shave days off the lead time on all of the products and, by working together, we have been able to optimise costs through design for manufacture to help the client achieve the elusive ‘price points’ it requires.
“This is a fantastic example of the power of MAN and how the group’s collective engineering expertise can help bring new technology to market quickly and within budget.”
Inventor-e’s Dean Henry concluded: “Interest in our vending technology is huge and we’ve now signed exclusive partnership deals with Rexel and Wolseley, as well as a working arrangement with Arco. This means volumes could increase rapidly and I’m confident we have the supply chain and manufacturing partners in place to meet this demand when it happens.
“The MAN Group has become a critical partner for us, from our initial engagement with PP Control & Automation to getting Grove involved in design and adding C-MAC SMT’s electronic expertise to projects. It’s a truly domestic effort in taking UK technology global.”
If growth plans are achieved, Inventor-e should create a further 20 jobs directly and a further 60 in the supply chain.
The Manufacturing Assembly Network is a collective of sub-contract manufacturers and a dedicated engineering design agency.
Employing more than 1750 people across 13 different factories, the group can offer every engineering discipline imaginable, including aluminium casting, automation and control systems, forging, plastic injection moulding, PCB development, precision machining, high-volume pressing, tube manipulation and welded assemblies.
Ian Knight, Chief Information Officer at PP Control & Automation (PP C&A) challenges the prevailing, often vague narrative around AI adoption and reframes the conversation around a more practical starting point: operational constraints.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept for manufacturers. It is already being explored across quotation, production planning, engineering, quality, supply chain and customer service functions. Yet, for many organisations, the gap between experimentation and meaningful operational impact remains difficult to close.
A leading aquaculture specialist – that is changing the way fish are vaccinated safely – has signed a major manufacturing deal.
On paper, defined discipline-specific suppliers can look organised. However, every additional supplier introduces another handoff, and every handoff creates another point where time, quality, communication and accountability can be lost.
Very rarely does growth not surface because an OEM lacks ambition. Shortcomings arise because operating models built to support such ambition don’t evolve quickly enough.
Recent weeks have brought two important industry moments into sharp focus, concluding that demand for AI and automation is rising, but investment, skills, and long-term thinking must follow.
For decades, one question has sat at the heart of operational strategy for machine builders and OEMs: make or buy? It’s a familiar debate and it isn’t the wrong question by any means, but perhaps it is an incomplete one.
In most machine building businesses, change is still treated as an exception. A late-stage drawing revision, component substitution, or wiring tweak discovered during build. Each one is handled, resolved, and signed off. And then everyone moves on. But what if that’s the wrong way to think about it? What if change isn’t the disruption to the system but the system itself?
