7th December 2017
Eight manufacturers from across the UK received a critical insight into cyber security this week, as part of the latest seminar hosted by PP Control & Automation.
Held in conjunction with The Processing and Packaging Machinery Trade Association (PPMA) and Telford-based Phoenix Contact, the interactive workshop highlighted how easy it is to hack into a system and some of the measures firms can take to prevent it from happening to them.
The ‘eye opening’ presentations – led by cyber security specialist Gareth Chamberlain – also talked through the new threats being posed by everything now being more connected through the ongoing adoption of Industry 4.0 and IOT.
“As technology and automation advances, so does the malicious intent of online criminals so businesses need to start acting now…before it is too late,” explained Ian Knight, Chief Technical & Information Officer at PP Control & Automation.
“This seminar attracted 16 senior level delegates from eight manufacturers and the feedback we got was extremely positive, ranging from ‘excellent’ to ‘scary’. The live demonstrations went down especially well as I think it brought it home to people what can happen.
“65% of major UK businesses have had security breaches…if that doesn’t get you worried nothing will.”
Phoenix Contact’s Gareth Chamberlain concluded: “A few hours where your systems are down through a ‘hack’ can cost you hundreds if not thousands of pounds, as well as crucial, confidential data and customer trust. The true impact can be catastrophic.
“The only way we can properly combat this is to understand what we’re up against and use that knowledge to come up with the best course of action. This is exactly what we started to address during the workshop.”
PP Control & Automation will launch a new series of seminars in January, working with its technical partners to help machinery builders keep on top of breaking trends and current challenges holding them back.
Ian Knight, Chief Information Officer at PP Control & Automation (PP C&A) challenges the prevailing, often vague narrative around AI adoption and reframes the conversation around a more practical starting point: operational constraints.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept for manufacturers. It is already being explored across quotation, production planning, engineering, quality, supply chain and customer service functions. Yet, for many organisations, the gap between experimentation and meaningful operational impact remains difficult to close.
A leading aquaculture specialist – that is changing the way fish are vaccinated safely – has signed a major manufacturing deal.
On paper, defined discipline-specific suppliers can look organised. However, every additional supplier introduces another handoff, and every handoff creates another point where time, quality, communication and accountability can be lost.
Very rarely does growth not surface because an OEM lacks ambition. Shortcomings arise because operating models built to support such ambition don’t evolve quickly enough.
Recent weeks have brought two important industry moments into sharp focus, concluding that demand for AI and automation is rising, but investment, skills, and long-term thinking must follow.
For decades, one question has sat at the heart of operational strategy for machine builders and OEMs: make or buy? It’s a familiar debate and it isn’t the wrong question by any means, but perhaps it is an incomplete one.
In most machine building businesses, change is still treated as an exception. A late-stage drawing revision, component substitution, or wiring tweak discovered during build. Each one is handled, resolved, and signed off. And then everyone moves on. But what if that’s the wrong way to think about it? What if change isn’t the disruption to the system but the system itself?
