19th February 2024
In its essence, networking entails “interacting with others to exchange information and cultivate professional or social connections.” However, in contemporary discourse, networking has often been reduced to a mere buzzword devoid of substantial action.
In a conversation featuring Richard Spears from PP Control & Automation and Rowan Crozier MBE, CEO of Brandauer, InspirON Exchange podcast host, Alex Edwards delves into the evolving concept of networking and collaboration in 2024.
The discussion not only explores the meaning of networking in today’s context but also examines the comparative landscape between the UK and other nations. Furthermore, it sheds light on the myriad opportunities stemming from collaborative efforts within the manufacturing industry.
InspirON Exchange is a podcast series by Protolabs, the organisation behind the fastest and most comprehensive manufacturing service in the world for Injection Moulded, CNC and 3D Printed parts.
Networking: just a buzzword or pivotal for manufacturing success?
Length: 44:11
Available on: Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and Radio Public.
Richard Spears, Marketing Manager at PP C&A
Rowan Crozier MBE, CEO at C. Brandauer & Co Ltd
Alex Edwards, Head of Communications EU, Protolabs
“I think we need to start joining the dots.
“Whether it’s Silicon Valley and its culture of innovation or its Mittelstand’s regional clusters, Denmark’s got an amazing renewable energy collaboration… they’ve all got very specific goals in mind and everybody’s behind it.
“Whereas in the UK, it saddens me to say, but I don’t think we have that singular direction. Where are we all heading? I think that’s what we need to work out.”
Richard Spears, Marketing Manager, PP Control & Automation
A conversation between Richard Spears (Marketing Manager) & Tony Hague (CEO) of PP Control & Automation, as they reflect on the most pertinent themes of 2023 in this REWIND23 campaign exclusive podcast episode.
Ian Knight, Chief Information Officer at PP Control & Automation (PP C&A) challenges the prevailing, often vague narrative around AI adoption and reframes the conversation around a more practical starting point: operational constraints.
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant concept for manufacturers. It is already being explored across quotation, production planning, engineering, quality, supply chain and customer service functions. Yet, for many organisations, the gap between experimentation and meaningful operational impact remains difficult to close.
A leading aquaculture specialist – that is changing the way fish are vaccinated safely – has signed a major manufacturing deal.
On paper, defined discipline-specific suppliers can look organised. However, every additional supplier introduces another handoff, and every handoff creates another point where time, quality, communication and accountability can be lost.
Very rarely does growth not surface because an OEM lacks ambition. Shortcomings arise because operating models built to support such ambition don’t evolve quickly enough.
Recent weeks have brought two important industry moments into sharp focus, concluding that demand for AI and automation is rising, but investment, skills, and long-term thinking must follow.
For decades, one question has sat at the heart of operational strategy for machine builders and OEMs: make or buy? It’s a familiar debate and it isn’t the wrong question by any means, but perhaps it is an incomplete one.
In most machine building businesses, change is still treated as an exception. A late-stage drawing revision, component substitution, or wiring tweak discovered during build. Each one is handled, resolved, and signed off. And then everyone moves on. But what if that’s the wrong way to think about it? What if change isn’t the disruption to the system but the system itself?
